Comparison
Kronenbourg,1664 vs Birra
Overall, Birra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kronenbourg,1664 | Birra |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Birra has 18% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Birra is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kronenbourg,1664 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kronenbourg,1664
Eau, MALT D'ORGE, BLE, sirop de glucose, extrait de houblon, SULFITES
Birra
acqua, malto d'orzo, mais, luppolo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kronenbourg,1664 or Birra?
Overall, Birra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Birra has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Birra has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.