Comparison

Kronenbourg,1664 vs Grimbergen 25 cl Grimbergen Rouge 5.5 DEGRE ALCOOL

Overall, Kronenbourg,1664 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKronenbourg,1664Grimbergen 25 cl Grimbergen...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 45 kcal 182 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.1 g 12 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kronenbourg,1664 has 75% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 182 kcal).
  • Kronenbourg,1664 has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Kronenbourg,1664 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Kronenbourg,1664

Eau, MALT D'ORGE, BLE, sirop de glucose, extrait de houblon, SULFITES

Grimbergen 25 cl Grimbergen Rouge 5.5 DEGRE ALCOOL

Eau, MALT D'ORGE, sirop de glucose, jus de fruits rouges à partir de concentré (2.5%), MALT DE BLE, arome naturel, Acide citrique (E330), EXTRAIT DE MALT D'ORGE, houblons

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kronenbourg,1664 or Grimbergen 25 cl Grimbergen Rouge 5.5 DEGRE ALCOOL?

Overall, Kronenbourg,1664 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kronenbourg,1664 has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kronenbourg,1664 has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons