Comparison
Korinthen vs Bio Korinthen
Overall, Bio Korinthen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Korinthen | Bio Korinthen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 330 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 68 g | 68 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | 6.7 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Korinthen has 56% less fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Bio Korinthen has 28% more fiber (6.7 g vs 4.8 g).
- Bio Korinthen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Korinthen
Korinthiaki.
Bio Korinthen
Korinthiaki
FAQ
Which is healthier: Korinthen or Bio Korinthen?
Overall, Bio Korinthen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Korinthen has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Korinthen has less sugar: 68 g versus 68 g per 100 g.