Comparison
Bio Korinthen vs Korinthen
Overall, Bio Korinthen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Korinthen | Korinthen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 68 g | 68.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Korinthen has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Bio Korinthen has 30% more fiber (6.7 g vs 4.7 g).
- Bio Korinthen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Korinthen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio Korinthen
Korinthiaki
Korinthen
Korinthiaki, Sonnenblumenöl.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Korinthen or Korinthen?
Overall, Bio Korinthen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Korinthen has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Korinthen has less sugar: 68 g versus 68.8 g per 100 g.