Kondensmilch vs Nuage de lait
Overall, Nuage de lait has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kondensmilch | Nuage de lait |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 132 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 7.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.2 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 13.4 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nuage de lait has 25% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Nuage de lait has 25% less fat (7.5 g vs 10 g).
- Nuage de lait has 28% less saturated fat (5.2 g vs 7.2 g).
- Nuage de lait has 25% less sugar (10 g vs 13.4 g).
- Kondensmilch has 22% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.1 g).
- Nuage de lait has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Nuage de lait lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kondensmilch
Not available.
Nuage de lait
_Lait_ entier, stabilisants: phosphate de sodium, carraghénanes
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kondensmilch or Nuage de lait?
Overall, Nuage de lait has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nuage de lait has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nuage de lait has less sugar: 10 g versus 13.4 g per 100 g.