Comparison

Kondensmilch vs Kaffee-Milch

Overall, Kaffee-Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKondensmilchKaffee-Milch
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 1
Calories 175 kcal 133 kcal
Fat 10 g 8 g
Saturated fat 7.2 g 5.4 g
Sugars 13.4 g 8.7 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Protein 7.8 g 6.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kaffee-Milch has 24% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 175 kcal).
  • Kaffee-Milch has 20% less fat (8 g vs 10 g).
  • Kaffee-Milch has 25% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Kaffee-Milch has 35% less sugar (8.7 g vs 13.4 g).
  • Kondensmilch has 15% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Kondensmilch has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kaffee-Milch lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Kondensmilch

Not available.

Kaffee-Milch

Kondensmilch wärmebehandelt, 8% Fett, 17 % fettarme Milchtrockenmasse

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kondensmilch or Kaffee-Milch?

Overall, Kaffee-Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kaffee-Milch has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kaffee-Milch has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 13.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons