Kondensmilch vs Kaffee-Milch
Overall, Kaffee-Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kondensmilch | Kaffee-Milch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.2 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 13.4 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaffee-Milch has 24% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Kaffee-Milch has 20% less fat (8 g vs 10 g).
- Kaffee-Milch has 25% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 7.2 g).
- Kaffee-Milch has 35% less sugar (8.7 g vs 13.4 g).
- Kondensmilch has 15% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.6 g).
- Kondensmilch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kaffee-Milch lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kondensmilch
Not available.
Kaffee-Milch
Kondensmilch wärmebehandelt, 8% Fett, 17 % fettarme Milchtrockenmasse
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kondensmilch or Kaffee-Milch?
Overall, Kaffee-Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaffee-Milch has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaffee-Milch has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 13.4 g per 100 g.