Kokoschips vs Rindbouillon
Overall, Rindbouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokoschips | Rindbouillon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 704 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 69 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 65 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindbouillon has 99% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 704 kcal).
- Rindbouillon has no fat, while Kokoschips has 69 g.
- Rindbouillon has no saturated fat, while Kokoschips has 65 g.
- Rindbouillon has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7 g).
- Kokoschips has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kokoschips has 100% more fiber (14 g vs 0 g).
- Kokoschips has 93% more protein (7.4 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rindbouillon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rindbouillon lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Kokoschips
Not available.
Rindbouillon
Kochsalz jodiert, Zucker, Geschmacksverstärker: Mononatriumglutamat, Dinatrium - guanylat und Dinatriuminosinat; Maltodextrin, Aroma, Rindfleischextrakt 3%, Hefeextrakt, Rindertalg, Gewürze (enthalten Sellerie).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokoschips or Rindbouillon?
Overall, Rindbouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindbouillon has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 704 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindbouillon has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7 g per 100 g.