Klasyczny vs Tartine et cuisson Demi-Sel
Overall, Klasyczny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Klasyczny | Tartine et cuisson Demi-Sel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 531 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Klasyczny has 39% fewer calories (326 kcal vs 531 kcal).
- Klasyczny has 41% less fat (35 g vs 59 g).
- Klasyczny has 77% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 22 g).
- Klasyczny has 73% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Tartine et cuisson Demi-Sel has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Klasyczny has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Klasyczny lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Klasyczny
woda, olej rzepakowy, estry stanoli roślinnych (stanole roślinne 6,6g/100g), tłuszcz palmowy, skrobia modyfikowana, sól (0,3%), _serwatka_ w proszku, emulgatory (mono - i diglicerydy kwasów tłuszczowych, lecytyna słonecznikowa), aromaty naturalne, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), substancja konserwująca (sorbinian potasu), barwnik (karoteny), witamina A, witamina D3.
Tartine et cuisson Demi-Sel
Huiles végétales, (colza, coco, tournesol, en proportions variables), eau, sel (1.1%), émulsifiants,acidifiant (acide citrique), arôme naturel,vitamines A et D.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Klasyczny or Tartine et cuisson Demi-Sel?
Overall, Klasyczny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Klasyczny has fewer calories: 326 kcal versus 531 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Klasyczny has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.