Comparison

Klasyczny vs ProActiv

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKlasycznyProActiv
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 326 kcal 314 kcal
Fat 35 g 35 g
Saturated fat 5.1 g 7.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives52
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Klasyczny has 33% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 7.6 g).
  • ProActiv has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Klasyczny lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Klasyczny

woda, olej rzepakowy, estry stanoli roślinnych (stanole roślinne 6,6g/100g), tłuszcz palmowy, skrobia modyfikowana, sól (0,3%), _serwatka_ w proszku, emulgatory (mono - i diglicerydy kwasów tłuszczowych, lecytyna słonecznikowa), aromaty naturalne, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), substancja konserwująca (sorbinian potasu), barwnik (karoteny), witamina A, witamina D3.

ProActiv

Eau, huiles végétales (colza, tournesol, coco, lin), esters de phytostérols 9% (équivalent à 5,4% de stérols végétaux), sel (0,2%), émulsifiant (lécithine), arômes naturels, vitamines A et D.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Klasyczny or ProActiv?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ProActiv has fewer calories: 314 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Klasyczny has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons