Kirschgrütze mit 60 % Fruchtanteil vs Kirsch Grütze
Overall, Kirsch Grütze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kirschgrütze mit 60 % Frucht... | Kirsch Grütze |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kirsch Grütze has 13% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 105 kcal).
- Kirsch Grütze has 10% less sugar (18 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Kirschgrütze mit 60 % Fruchtanteil
Not available.
Kirsch Grütze
Sauerkirschen 60%, Wasser, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke, Stärke, Verdickungsmittel (Xanthan, Johannisbrotkernmehl).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kirschgrütze mit 60 % Fruchtanteil or Kirsch Grütze?
Overall, Kirsch Grütze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kirsch Grütze has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kirsch Grütze has less sugar: 18 g versus 20 g per 100 g.