Kipferl vs PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER - 126g
Overall, Kipferl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kipferl | PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 555 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 23 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kipferl has 11% less fat (31 g vs 35 g).
- Kipferl has 37% less saturated fat (12 g vs 19 g).
- Kipferl has 43% less sugar (23 g vs 40 g).
- Kipferl has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER - 126g has 16% more protein (10 g vs 8.4 g).
- Only Kipferl lists: Eggs.
- Only PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER - 126g lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kipferl
WEIZENMEHL, Palmöl, Zucker, gemahlene HASELNÜSSE (12 %), VOLLMILCHPULVER, HÜHNERVOLLEI, Backtrieb mittel: Natriumcarbonate, Diphosphate; Dextrose, Stärke (WEIZEN), Aroma, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Trennmittel: Magnesiumsalze der Speisefettsäuren; Salz, Zimt. Kann enthalten: MANDELN.
PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER - 126g
Chocolat au LAIT 39 % (sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, poudre de LAIT entier, poudre de LAIT écrémé, émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA), NOISETTES 27 % dans le fourrage à la crème, sucre, graisse végétale (palmiste), farine de BLÉ, poudre de lactosérum (LAIT), poudre de LAIT écrémé, poudre de crème (LAIT), extrait de malt d'ORGE, cacao maigre, huile de coco, émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA, poudres à lever (carbonates acides de sodium, diphosphates disodiques), sel, farine de SOJA, épices, gousses de vanille Bourbon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kipferl or PÂT. TORTINA 6X21G - LOACKER - 126g?
Overall, Kipferl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kipferl has fewer calories: 542 kcal versus 555 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kipferl has less sugar: 23 g versus 40 g per 100 g.