Kinder Moulage Père Noël 110g vs Kinder Joy
Overall, Kinder Joy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kinder Moulage Père Noël 110... | Kinder Joy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 579 kcal | 550 kcal |
| Fat | 36.2 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 24.1 g | 15.4 g |
| Sugars | 53.6 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kinder Joy has 12% less fat (32 g vs 36.2 g).
- Kinder Joy has 36% less saturated fat (15.4 g vs 24.1 g).
- Only Kinder Joy lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kinder Moulage Père Noël 110g
Chocolat supérieur au LAIT 45% (sucre, LAIT en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiants : lécithines [SOJA] ; vanilline), LAIT écrémé en poudre 17,5%, sucre, graisses végétales (palme, karité), BEURRE concentré, émulsifiants : lécithines [SOJA] ; vanilline. Sur le total : produits laitiers 32%, cacao 14,5%. Le chocolat utilisé est un chocolat pur beurre de cacao.
Kinder Joy
sugar, vegetable fats (palm, shea), skimmed milk powder 19.5%, wheat flour, low-fat cocoa 3.5%, wheat starch, cocoa mass, barley malt extract, emulsifiers: lecithins [soya], sunflower oil, milk proteins, cocoa butter, flavourings, raising agents (ammonium acid carbonate, sodium acid carbonate), salt,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kinder Moulage Père Noël 110g or Kinder Joy?
Overall, Kinder Joy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kinder Joy has fewer calories: 550 kcal versus 579 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kinder Joy has less sugar: 51 g versus 53.6 g per 100 g.