Kevytviili vs Kerrosviili Kuningatar
Overall, Kevytviili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kevytviili | Kerrosviili Kuningatar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kevytviili has 12% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Kerrosviili Kuningatar has 60% less fat (1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kerrosviili Kuningatar has 60% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kevytviili has 52% less sugar (4.2 g vs 8.7 g).
- Kevytviili is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kevytviili
Pastöroitu maito, maitovalmiste proteiinivakiointiin, hapate
Kerrosviili Kuningatar
Pastöroitu maito, sokeri, vadelmasose 1,7%, mustikka 1,7%, muunnettu tärkkelys, sakeuttamisaineet (pektiini, johanneksenleipäpuujauhe), happamuudensäätöaine (natriumsitraatit), väri (antosyaanit), aromit ja hapate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kevytviili or Kerrosviili Kuningatar?
Overall, Kevytviili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kevytviili has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kevytviili has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.