Kesselchips Country Ketchup style vs Chips Tomato Ketchup
Overall, Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kesselchips Country Ketchup... | Chips Tomato Ketchup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 493 kcal | 528 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has 19% less fat (26 g vs 32 g).
- Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has 41% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has 13% more fiber (4.7 g vs 4.1 g).
- Only Chips Tomato Ketchup lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kesselchips Country Ketchup style
Kartoffeln, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps in veranderlic Gewichtsanteilen), Zucker, natürliches Aroma, Speisesalz, Zwiebel Stärke, Hefeextrakt, Tomatenpulver, Knoblauchpulver, Gewürze,
Chips Tomato Ketchup
pommes de terre, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza, maïs, en proportion variable), goût Heinz Tomato Ketchup [sucre, arômes, poudre de lactosérum (de lait), tomate en poudre, chlorure de potassium, acidifiant (acide citrique), colorant (extrait de paprika)], sel,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kesselchips Country Ketchup style or Chips Tomato Ketchup?
Overall, Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kesselchips Country Ketchup style has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 528 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips Tomato Ketchup has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3 g per 100 g.