Kers vs Mhmm... KIRSCHE
Overall, Kers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kers | Mhmm... KIRSCHE |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 74 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kers has 97% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 317 kcal).
- Kers has no fat, while Mhmm... KIRSCHE has 0.5 g.
- Kers has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 74 g).
- Mhmm... KIRSCHE has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kers
Water, kersensap uit Vruchtensapconcentraat 3,6%, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), natuurlijke aroma's, zwarte wortelconcentraat, appelextract, zoetstoffen (sucralose, steviolglycosiden uit stevia), conserveermiddelen (kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat), vitamine C.
Mhmm... KIRSCHE
Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Wasser, 10% Sauerkirschsaft aus Sauerkirschsaftkonzentrat, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Farbstoff (Karottenkonzentrat), Aroma
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kers or Mhmm... KIRSCHE?
Overall, Kers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kers has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 74 g per 100 g.