Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn vs Cavi-Art
Overall, Cavi-Art has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn | Cavi-Art |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 7 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cavi-Art has 96% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Cavi-Art has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 26 g).
- Cavi-Art has no saturated fat, while Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn has 2 g.
- Cavi-Art has no sugar, while Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn has 16 g.
- Cavi-Art has 50% less salt (3.5 g vs 7 g).
- Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn has 92% more protein (12 g vs 1 g).
- Cavi-Art has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn
Torskerogn, rapsolje, sukker, potetflak, vann, natriumbenzoat, askorbinsyre, apokarotenal, karmin
Cavi-Art
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaviar 60% norsk torskerogn or Cavi-Art?
Overall, Cavi-Art has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cavi-Art has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cavi-Art has less sugar: 0 g versus 16 g per 100 g.