Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild Pur vs Kéfir natural
Overall, Kéfir natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild P... | Kéfir natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 36 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kéfir natural has 22% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Kéfir natural has 65% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kéfir natural has no saturated fat, while Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild Pur has 1 g.
- Kéfir natural has no sugar, while Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild Pur has 4.1 g.
- Kéfir natural has 13% more protein (3.9 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild Pur
Milch.
Kéfir natural
Leche desnatada pasteurizada y fermentos lacticos (incluidos fermentos kéfir),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalinka Kefir Fettarm Mild Pur or Kéfir natural?
Overall, Kéfir natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kéfir natural has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kéfir natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.