Comparison
Kaki vs Kaki
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaki | Kaki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 13.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaki has 75% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 270 kcal).
- Kaki has 100% less fat (0.2 g vs 30 g).
- Kaki has no sugar, while Kaki has 13.9 g.
- Kaki has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kaki
Not available.
Kaki
Kaki
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaki or Kaki?
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaki has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaki has less sugar: 0 g versus 13.9 g per 100 g.