Comparison
Kaki vs Kaki
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaki | Kaki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 62 g | 13.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaki has 77% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 298 kcal).
- Kaki has 92% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Kaki has 78% less sugar (13.9 g vs 62 g).
- Kaki has 60% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kaki has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kaki lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kaki
Suszone owoce kaki, dwutlenek siarki.
Kaki
Kaki
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaki or Kaki?
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaki has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaki has less sugar: 13.9 g versus 62 g per 100 g.