Kakaobutter vs 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate
Overall, 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Kakaobutter
100% Dark Drinking Chocolate
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kakaobutter | 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 900 kcal | 634 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 54.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 60 g | 33 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 13.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 30% fewer calories (634 kcal vs 900 kcal).
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 46% less fat (54.1 g vs 100 g).
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 45% less saturated fat (33 g vs 60 g).
- Kakaobutter has no sugar, while 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 0.5 g.
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 100% more fiber (5.3 g vs 0 g).
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 100% more protein (13.5 g vs 0 g).
- 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kakaobutter
Kakaobutter
100% Dark Drinking Chocolate
cocoa mass
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kakaobutter or 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate?
Overall, 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has fewer calories: 634 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kakaobutter has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.