Comparison

Kakaobutter Natural vs 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate

Overall, 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKakaobutter Natural100% Dark Drinking Chocolate
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 2
Calories 900 kcal 634 kcal
Fat 100 g 54.1 g
Saturated fat 60 g 33 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 5.3 g
Protein 0 g 13.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 30% fewer calories (634 kcal vs 900 kcal).
  • 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 46% less fat (54.1 g vs 100 g).
  • 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 45% less saturated fat (33 g vs 60 g).
  • Kakaobutter Natural has no sugar, while 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 0.5 g.
  • 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has 100% more protein (13.5 g vs 0 g).
  • 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kakaobutter Natural

Kakaobutter natural aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau

100% Dark Drinking Chocolate

cocoa mass

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kakaobutter Natural or 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate?

Overall, 100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

100% Dark Drinking Chocolate has fewer calories: 634 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kakaobutter Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons