Comparison
Jus de myrtilles vs Succobene
Overall, Succobene has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jus de myrtilles | Succobene |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 8.4 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jus de myrtilles has 24% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 49 kcal).
- Succobene has no fat, while Jus de myrtilles has 0.5 g.
- Succobene has 17% less sugar (7 g vs 8.4 g).
Ingredients
Jus de myrtilles
100% Heidelbeere
Succobene
100% mirtillo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jus de myrtilles or Succobene?
Overall, Succobene has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jus de myrtilles has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Succobene has less sugar: 7 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.