Irrigador +Protéinas Coco vs Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas
Overall, Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Irrigador +Protéinas Coco
Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Irrigador +Protéinas Coco | Postre lácteo con arándanos... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has 13% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has 12% less sugar (4.6 g vs 5.2 g).
Ingredients
Irrigador +Protéinas Coco
leite magro, água, frutos e,coco ralado (0,7%), amido modificado, aromas, espessante: pertinaz, edulcorantes: acesulfame de potássio e sucralose, fermentos láctios.
Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas
Leche desnatada, arándano 7,5%, agua, fructosa, almidón modificado, aromas, espesante (pectinas), edulcorantes (acesulfame potásico, sucralosa), colorante (antocianina), fermentos _lácticos_,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Irrigador +Protéinas Coco or Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas?
Overall, Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Postre lácteo con arándanos +Proteínas has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.