Comparison
IPA vs Pilsner
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | IPA | Pilsner |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilsner has 23% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- IPA has no sugar, while Pilsner has 0.5 g.
- IPA has 38% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
IPA
EAU, MALT D'_ORGE_, MALT DE _BLÉ_, HOUBLONS, EXTRAIT DE HOUBLON
Pilsner
Wasser, _Gersten_malz, Hopfenextrakt
FAQ
Which is healthier: IPA or Pilsner?
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilsner has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
IPA has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.