Comparison
Iodized salt vs Mineralsalt
Overall, Mineralsalt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iodized salt | Mineralsalt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 98 g | 63.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mineralsalt has 35% less salt (63.9 g vs 98 g).
Ingredients
Iodized salt
cooked edible salt, potassium iodate, E535
Mineralsalt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iodized salt or Mineralsalt?
Overall, Mineralsalt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Iodized salt has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Iodized salt has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.