Comparison

Instant Bone Broth - Chicken Ramen vs Fond Huhn

Overall, Fond Huhn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientInstant Bone Broth - Chicken...Fond Huhn
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 336 kcal 11 kcal
Fat 2 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat — 0.1 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 7.9 g 1 g
Fiber 4 g —
Protein 66 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fond Huhn has 97% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 336 kcal).
  • Fond Huhn has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Fond Huhn has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Fond Huhn has 88% less salt (1 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Instant Bone Broth - Chicken Ramen has 98% more protein (66 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Instant Bone Broth - Chicken Ramen lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Instant Bone Broth - Chicken Ramen

Chicken Bone Broth Powder (51%)*, Yeast Extract [Yeast Extract, Salt), Dehydrated Tamari Gluten Free Soy Sauce Powder (Soybeans), Red Miso Powder (Soybeans, Rice, Salt, Water, Koji Starter), Natural Flavourings, Leek Powder, Ground Ginger, Olive Oil, Ground White Pepper, Garlic Extract, Ground Turmeric, Ginger Extract, Onion Extract, Pepper Extract. Allergy Advice:

Fond Huhn

ingredents Bouillon de poulet concentré 98,7% (eau, extrait de viande de poulet 0.6%, viande de poulet 0,4%, graisse de poulet, peau de poulet) sel, arôme naturel, sucre, curcuma, amidon de mais, concentre de jus d'oignon, poivre macis

FAQ

Which is healthier: Instant Bone Broth - Chicken Ramen or Fond Huhn?

Overall, Fond Huhn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fond Huhn has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fond Huhn has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons