Ile flottante vs Île flottante sur crème anglaise
Overall, Île flottante sur crème anglaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ile flottante | Île flottante sur crème angl... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 142 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Île flottante sur crème anglaise has 15% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 142 kcal).
- Île flottante sur crème anglaise has 32% less fat (2.7 g vs 4 g).
- Île flottante sur crème anglaise has 40% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Île flottante sur crème anglaise has 14% less sugar (18 g vs 21 g).
- Île flottante sur crème anglaise has 12% more protein (4.9 g vs 4.3 g).
- Only Île flottante sur crème anglaise lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Ile flottante
Not available.
Île flottante sur crème anglaise
Lait demi-écrémé (origine: France), blanc d'oeufs frais 16,2%, sucre, jaune d'oeufs' frais 6,1%, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, arôme naturel de vanille 0,6%, épaississant: gomme xanthane, gousses de vanille épuisées 0,02%. Garniture caramel 5%: sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, eau.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ile flottante or Île flottante sur crème anglaise?
Overall, Île flottante sur crème anglaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Île flottante sur crème anglaise has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Île flottante sur crème anglaise has less sugar: 18 g versus 21 g per 100 g.