Ice tea vs Club-Mate Original
Overall, Ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ice tea | Club-Mate Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 13 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ice tea has 35% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Ice tea has 40% less sugar (3 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Ice tea
Eau, sucre, fructose, acidifiants (acide citrique, acide malique), extrait de thé noir (1) (0,12%), jus de pêche à base de concentré (0,1%), correcteur d'acidité (citrates de sodium), arômes, antioxydant (acide ascorbique), édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol (1) Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Plus d'informations sur ra.org. People and nature = l'humain et la nature. issus de Stevia). %* pour le LIPTO ADO 0.03g 7,8g 7,5g 8% 50 0,08 g 2% pour un adulte-type (8400 kJ/
Club-Mate Original
Wasser, Glukose-Fructosesirup, Zucker, Getränkegrundstoff (Mate-Tee-Extrakt, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, karamellisierter Zuckersirup, Koffein, natürliches Aroma), Kohlensäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ice tea or Club-Mate Original?
Overall, Ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ice tea has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ice tea has less sugar: 3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.