Comparison
Hüma Chia Energy Gel vs Amêndoa Sem Pele
Overall, Amêndoa Sem Pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hüma Chia Energy Gel | Amêndoa Sem Pele |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 278 kcal | 605 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 44.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 13.9 g | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 13.9 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hüma Chia Energy Gel has 54% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 605 kcal).
- Hüma Chia Energy Gel has 95% less fat (2.8 g vs 52 g).
- Hüma Chia Energy Gel has no saturated fat, while Amêndoa Sem Pele has 4.5 g.
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has 95% less sugar (2.3 g vs 44.4 g).
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has no salt, while Hüma Chia Energy Gel has 0.8 g.
- Hüma Chia Energy Gel has 45% more fiber (13.9 g vs 7.7 g).
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has 42% more protein (24 g vs 13.9 g).
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hüma Chia Energy Gel
Not available.
Amêndoa Sem Pele
redientes: Miolo de amêndoa sem pele. ALER
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hüma Chia Energy Gel or Amêndoa Sem Pele?
Overall, Amêndoa Sem Pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hüma Chia Energy Gel has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amêndoa Sem Pele has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 44.4 g per 100 g.