Comparison
Creatine Monohydrate vs Amêndoa Sem Pele
Overall, Creatine Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Creatine Monohydrate | Amêndoa Sem Pele |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 605 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Creatine Monohydrate has no calories, while Amêndoa Sem Pele has 605 kcal.
- Creatine Monohydrate has no fat, while Amêndoa Sem Pele has 52 g.
- Creatine Monohydrate has no saturated fat, while Amêndoa Sem Pele has 4.5 g.
- Creatine Monohydrate has no sugar, while Amêndoa Sem Pele has 2.3 g.
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has 100% more fiber (7.7 g vs 0 g).
- Amêndoa Sem Pele has 100% more protein (24 g vs 0 g).
- Creatine Monohydrate has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Creatine Monohydrate
Not available.
Amêndoa Sem Pele
redientes: Miolo de amêndoa sem pele. ALER
FAQ
Which is healthier: Creatine Monohydrate or Amêndoa Sem Pele?
Overall, Creatine Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Creatine Monohydrate has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Creatine Monohydrate has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.