Huile pour wok thai vs Kujawski czosnek bazylia
Overall, Kujawski czosnek bazylia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huile pour wok thai | Kujawski czosnek bazylia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 900 kcal | 888 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 98.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 7.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kujawski czosnek bazylia has 59% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 18 g).
- Kujawski czosnek bazylia has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kujawski czosnek bazylia is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Huile pour wok thai
Huile de pépins de raisin, arômes naturels.
Kujawski czosnek bazylia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huile pour wok thai or Kujawski czosnek bazylia?
Overall, Kujawski czosnek bazylia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kujawski czosnek bazylia has fewer calories: 888 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huile pour wok thai has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.