Huile de cumin noir vierge vs Optima
Overall, Optima has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huile de cumin noir vierge | Optima |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 828 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 92 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Optima has 21% less saturated fat (11 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Huile de cumin noir vierge
Cumin noir (nigelle)
Optima
Huile d'olive vierge extra (35%), huile de colza raffinée (32,5%), huile de tournesol raffinée à haute teneur en acide oléique (32,5%). INEOR
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huile de cumin noir vierge or Optima?
Overall, Optima has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Huile de cumin noir vierge has fewer calories: 828 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huile de cumin noir vierge has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.