Hip pop kombucha vs Limonata
Overall, Limonata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hip pop kombucha | Limonata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 22.4 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Limonata has 61% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Limonata has 65% less sugar (7.9 g vs 22.4 g).
- Limonata has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hip pop kombucha
Water, rietsuiker, groene thee, zwarte thee, kombucha cultuur, bosbessensap uit concentraat, gembersap, citroensap, natuurlijke smaakstoffen, levende culturen (Bacillus coagulans)
Limonata
Eau, jus de citron à base de concentré (11%), sucre, jus de citron (5%), dioxyde de carbone, arôme naturel de citron
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hip pop kombucha or Limonata?
Overall, Limonata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Limonata has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Limonata has less sugar: 7.9 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.