Comparison

Mirinda Orange vs Hip pop kombucha

Overall, Mirinda Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMirinda OrangeHip pop kombucha
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 53 kcal 91 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 13 g 22.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives60
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mirinda Orange has 41% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 91 kcal).
  • Mirinda Orange has 42% less sugar (13 g vs 22.4 g).

Ingredients

Mirinda Orange

Koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, voedingszuur E300, emulgator E414, conserveermiddel E202, E211, natuurlijke sinaasappelsmaak, antioxidan E300, E385, kleurstof *E110. *Kan de activiteit op oplettendheid van kinderen negatief beinvloeden.

Hip pop kombucha

Water, rietsuiker, groene thee, zwarte thee, kombucha cultuur, bosbessensap uit concentraat, gembersap, citroensap, natuurlijke smaakstoffen, levende culturen (Bacillus coagulans)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mirinda Orange or Hip pop kombucha?

Overall, Mirinda Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mirinda Orange has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mirinda Orange has less sugar: 13 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons