Comparison
Himalayan Salt vs Sal Himalaya
Overall, Himalayan Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Himalayan Salt | Sal Himalaya |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 464 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 97.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sal Himalaya has no calories, while Himalayan Salt has 464 kcal.
- Sal Himalaya has no fat, while Himalayan Salt has 21.4 g.
- Himalayan Salt has 99% less salt (1.2 g vs 97.8 g).
- Himalayan Salt has 100% more fiber (3.6 g vs 0 g).
- Himalayan Salt has 100% more protein (7.1 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Himalayan Salt
potatoes, vegetable oils (canola, sunflower and/or safflower), himalayan pink salt.
Sal Himalaya
100% Sal rosa del Himalaya.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Himalayan Salt or Sal Himalaya?
Overall, Himalayan Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sal Himalaya has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Himalayan Salt has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.