Comparison

Hershey's Special Dark Original vs Roscos de naranja

Overall, Hershey's Special Dark Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHershey's Special Dark Origi...Roscos de naranja
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 528 kcal 859 kcal
Fat 33 g 61.7 g
Saturated fat 20 g 2.2 g
Sugars 37 g 17 g
Salt 0 g 0.7 g
Fiber 12 g 3.8 g
Protein 7.7 g 5 g
Additives20
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hershey's Special Dark Original has 39% fewer calories (528 kcal vs 859 kcal).
  • Hershey's Special Dark Original has 47% less fat (33 g vs 61.7 g).
  • Roscos de naranja has 89% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 20 g).
  • Roscos de naranja has 54% less sugar (17 g vs 37 g).
  • Hershey's Special Dark Original has no salt, while Roscos de naranja has 0.7 g.
  • Hershey's Special Dark Original has 68% more fiber (12 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Hershey's Special Dark Original has 35% more protein (7.7 g vs 5 g).
  • Roscos de naranja has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Hershey's Special Dark Original lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Hershey's Special Dark Original

Masa de cacao (51,8%), azúcar, cacao en polvo (5,2%), aceite de palmiste y palma refinado e interesterificado, manteca de cacao (2,8%), lecitina de soya, poliglicerol polirricinoleato, sabor idéntico al natural.

Roscos de naranja

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hershey's Special Dark Original or Roscos de naranja?

Overall, Hershey's Special Dark Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hershey's Special Dark Original has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 859 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roscos de naranja has less sugar: 17 g versus 37 g per 100 g.

More comparisons