Haricots rouges vs Alubia roja
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots rouges | Alubia roja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 88 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | — |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots rouges has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Haricots rouges has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Haricots rouges
Eau, haricots rouges bio trempés, sel de Noirmoutier (0,45%).
Alubia roja
Alubias rojas, agua, sal, antioxidante (E385).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots rouges or Alubia roja?
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots rouges has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots rouges has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.