Haricots rouges vs Haricots rouges à la mexicaine
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots rouges | Haricots rouges à la mexicai... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots rouges à la mexicaine has 24% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 96 kcal).
- Haricots rouges has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Haricots rouges has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Haricots rouges has 31% more fiber (6.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Haricots rouges has 40% more protein (7.2 g vs 4.3 g).
- Only Haricots rouges à la mexicaine lists: Celery, Gluten.
Ingredients
Haricots rouges
Eau, haricots rouges trempés, sel. Traces éventuelles de soja.
Haricots rouges à la mexicaine
Haricots rouges précuits (eau, haricots rouges) 43%, eau, carottes 9%, maïs 3%. ail 1.4%, concentré de tomate 1,4%, huile de tournesol, sel, farine de blé, oignon en poudre, coriandre 0.1%, cumin, piment de Cayenne 0,05%, extraits d'épices, extrait de thym, céleri en poudre. Traces éventuelles de crustacés, œuf, poisson, lait, moutarde, mollusques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots rouges or Haricots rouges à la mexicaine?
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots rouges à la mexicaine has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots rouges has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.