Halva Vanille vs Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel
Overall, Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Halva Vanille
Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Halva Vanille | Halva - Snack délicat au sés... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 556 kcal | 533 kcal |
| Fat | 35.4 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 29.3 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 13.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds, Sezamu | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has 23% less saturated fat (5.9 g vs 7.7 g).
- Halva Vanille has 14% less sugar (29.3 g vs 34 g).
- Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has 12% more protein (13.8 g vs 12.2 g).
- Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Halva Vanille lists: Sezamu.
Ingredients
Halva Vanille
52% masa sezamowa (zmielone nasiona _sezamu_), syrop glukozowo - fruktozowy, olej roślinny (olej palmowy), ekstrakt z mydlnicy lekarskiej, aromat: wanilina
Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel
Graines de sésame broyés 52%, miel 48%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Halva Vanille or Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel?
Overall, Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Halva - Snack délicat au sésame et au miel has fewer calories: 533 kcal versus 556 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Halva Vanille has less sugar: 29.3 g versus 34 g per 100 g.