Halva turk vs Chamia
Overall, Halva turk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Halva turk | Chamia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 531 kcal | 563 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Halva turk has 19% less fat (29 g vs 36 g).
- Halva turk has no saturated fat, while Chamia has 5.9 g.
- Halva turk has no sugar, while Chamia has 36 g.
- Chamia has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).
- Halva turk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chamia lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Halva turk
Not available.
Chamia
Pâte de sésame - Sucre - Sirop de glucose - Amandes (5%) - Monoglycéride : Emulsifiant (E471) - Extrait @ de racine pour Halawa - Acide citrique : Régulateur d'acidité (E330) - Vanilline (Arôme artificiel).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Halva turk or Chamia?
Overall, Halva turk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Halva turk has fewer calories: 531 kcal versus 563 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Halva turk has less sugar: 0 g versus 36 g per 100 g.