Comparison
Habas baby vs Habitas muy tiernas
Overall, Habitas muy tiernas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Habas baby | Habitas muy tiernas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Habas baby has 13% fewer calories (61 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Habitas muy tiernas has 32% more fiber (6.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Habitas muy tiernas has 12% more protein (5.8 g vs 5.1 g).
Ingredients
Habas baby
Habas babys,
Habitas muy tiernas
Habas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Habas baby or Habitas muy tiernas?
Overall, Habitas muy tiernas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Habas baby has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Habitas muy tiernas has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.