Comparison

Guinness vs Tyskie Gronie (5,2%)

Overall, Guinness has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGuinnessTyskie Gronie (5,2%)
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 23 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.8 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Guinness has 47% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 43 kcal).
  • Only Guinness lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Guinness

GUINNESS TH TM FOR IGN EXTRA STOUT BIER CERVESA EXTRA a IN IRELAN Y - FABRICADO POR - BRASSE ST. JAMES'S GATE, DUBLIN 8. GUINNESS& ELAND IRLAA - IRLANDIA. DISTRIBUE EN FRA E PAR MAXI SEC. 881U 20g

Tyskie Gronie (5,2%)

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Guinness or Tyskie Gronie (5,2%)?

Overall, Guinness has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Guinness has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Guinness has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons