Comparison
Groseille rouges vs Rode bessen
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Groseille rouges | Rode bessen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode bessen has 42% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Rode bessen has no fat, while Groseille rouges has 0.7 g.
- Rode bessen has 40% less sugar (4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Rode bessen has 44% more fiber (8.2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Groseille rouges has 36% more protein (1.6 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Groseille rouges
Groseilles rouges
Rode bessen
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Groseille rouges or Rode bessen?
Overall, Rode bessen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode bessen has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode bessen has less sugar: 4 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.