Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL vs La Trappe quadruple 10%
Overall, Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL
La Trappe quadruple 10%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen... | La Trappe quadruple 10% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La Trappe quadruple 10% has 24% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has no saturated fat, while La Trappe quadruple 10% has 1 g.
- Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has 90% less sugar (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- La Trappe quadruple 10% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL
Eau, MALT D'ORGE, sirop de glucose, MALT DE BLE, caramel aromatique, extrait de houblon
La Trappe quadruple 10%
Eau, _malt d'orge_, houblon, levure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL or La Trappe quadruple 10%?
Overall, Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La Trappe quadruple 10% has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grimbergen 50 cl Grimbergen Blonde 6.7 DEGRE ALCOOL has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 2 g per 100 g.