Comparison

Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti vs Italienisches Antipasti

Overall, Italienisches Antipasti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGreek Salad Marinated Antipa...Italienisches Antipasti
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 221 kcal 80 kcal
Fat 19.5 g 5.4 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 2.2 g 5 g
Salt 1.6 g 2 g
Fiber 1.5 g 2.7 g
Protein 7.7 g 1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Italienisches Antipasti has 64% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 221 kcal).
  • Italienisches Antipasti has 72% less fat (5.4 g vs 19.5 g).
  • Italienisches Antipasti has 92% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti has 56% less sugar (2.2 g vs 5 g).
  • Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti has 19% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
  • Italienisches Antipasti has 44% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti has 87% more protein (7.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Italienisches Antipasti has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti

Not available.

Italienisches Antipasti

Gegrilltes Gemüse in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen 55,3 % (rote und gelbe Paprika, Auberginen, Zucchini), Sonnenblumenöl 39,3%, Weinessig (enthält Sulfite), Salz, Säureregulator: Citronensäure. Kann Spuren von Fisch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti or Italienisches Antipasti?

Overall, Italienisches Antipasti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Italienisches Antipasti has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Greek Salad Marinated Antipasti has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons