Granulated No Calorie Sweetner vs Sucralose
Overall, Granulated No Calorie Sweetner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Granulated No Calorie Sweetn... | Sucralose |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Granulated No Calorie Sweetner has no sugar, while Sucralose has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Granulated No Calorie Sweetner
malodextrine, sucralose
Sucralose
Eau, édulcorants (sucralose, fructose), correcteur d'acuité E330, conservateur E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Granulated No Calorie Sweetner or Sucralose?
Overall, Granulated No Calorie Sweetner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Granulated No Calorie Sweetner has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 2 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Granulated No Calorie Sweetner has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.