Grand cru de charal vs Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G.
Overall, Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grand cru de charal | Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 192 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has 33% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 192 kcal).
- Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has 58% less fat (5 g vs 12 g).
- Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has 66% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.7 g).
Ingredients
Grand cru de charal
100% pure viande de boeuf.
Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G.
100% pure viande de bœuf (Origine France).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grand cru de charal or Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G.?
Overall, Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Pur Bœuf 5% de M.G. has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 192 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grand cru de charal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.