Comparison
Gran Casa Azzurra vs Granmulino
Overall, Granmulino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gran Casa Azzurra | Granmulino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 407 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 32 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Granmulino has 19% fewer calories (329 kcal vs 407 kcal).
- Granmulino has 29% less fat (22 g vs 31 g).
- Granmulino has 33% less saturated fat (14 g vs 21 g).
- Only Gran Casa Azzurra lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gran Casa Azzurra
Fromage affiné pâte dure italien (lait, sel, présure). Matières grasses sur produit fini 31%
Granmulino
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gran Casa Azzurra or Granmulino?
Overall, Granmulino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Granmulino has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 407 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gran Casa Azzurra has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.