Goldband Selar vs Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted
Overall, Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldband Selar | Fish Snack Beer Club Classic... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 267 kcal |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 9.1 g | 7.9 g |
| Protein | 56.2 g | 53 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has 63% less fat (2 g vs 5.3 g).
- Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has no saturated fat, while Goldband Selar has 3.2 g.
- Goldband Selar has 83% less sugar (1.2 g vs 7 g).
- Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has 13% less salt (7.9 g vs 9.1 g).
Ingredients
Goldband Selar
Not available.
Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldband Selar or Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted?
Overall, Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fish Snack Beer Club Classic Squid Salted has fewer calories: 267 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goldband Selar has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.