Gnocchi Patate douce vs Gnocchi Klassik
Overall, Gnocchi Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gnocchi Patate douce | Gnocchi Klassik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gnocchi Klassik has 13% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 167 kcal).
- Gnocchi Klassik has 57% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Gnocchi Klassik has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Gnocchi Klassik has 14% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Gnocchi Patate douce has 25% more protein (4.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Gnocchi Patate douce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Gnocchi Klassik lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gnocchi Patate douce
Purée de patate douce (54%) (eau, patates douces"), semoule de blé dur* (38%), fécule de pomme de terre*, sel marin, poudre de chili*, farine de riz*. Issu de l'agriculture biologique
Gnocchi Klassik
Wasser, 18% Weizenmehl, 14% Kartoffelflocken (getrocknete Kartoffeln, Säureregulator: Citronensäure; Gewürze Kartoffelstärke, Speisesalz, Laktose, Säureregulator: Säureregulator: Milchsäure; Gewürze, Milcheiweiß, Maismehl. Kann Spuren von Soja und Senf enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gnocchi Patate douce or Gnocchi Klassik?
Overall, Gnocchi Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gnocchi Klassik has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gnocchi Klassik has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.